Interestingly, someone found the idea that I would want to change a child's gun play (and therefore, something that arises from their true nature) into something else, a little bit offensive.
(This was interesting to hear, not least because in my examples of transforming gun play, the children were still playing guns, just not killing each other!)
"This is interesting to me. you have seen that it is nature not nurture. in fact, most child studies have shown this to be the case (kids never exposed to guns will pick up objects and use them as such) however you (and many others) want to change it. Why? if your child were gay would you change that? No, I dare say most people would embrace that and be proud that they could. However, in the interest of being all new agey and loving...you try to change your child's true nature. Thereby giving it a definition of being bad. An inherent part of your child. ! Does this bother no one else???
How about just showing them the proper way to use a gun? How about not making a big issue out of it? How about loving all parts of your child even though that may be less than acceptable but are them, their nature?
I am certainly not a gun toting conservative but it seems to me a double standard. I would rather love all parts of my child, especially those inherently him, and help him to see how good they all are, then change them"
I love it when someone, anyone, brings me another point of view.
The last thing I ever want in my life is to be stuck, dogmatic, inflexible.
In fact, I strive hard to practice stretching -a kind of yoga of sorts :) - in my thinking every day.
I read from a wide variety of sources (from The New Yorker, to Women's Weekly, Whole living to Vogue, Organic Gardener to Grass Roots, Architectural Digest to the 'trashies', wonderful bits of fluff that they are!- anything that catches my eye).
I regularly, weekly, walk out from the library with at least 20 things.
I actively seek out documentaries, but love You Tube too, and foreign films and thought-provoking movies.
(but romantic comedies are my favourite!)
I mix with a wide variety of people, of all ages, from all walks of life.
But someone else's opinion can open your thinking in a way that other fodder can't.
Thank you.
BUT
I have given this more thought than usual.
And you know, as much as I might be called a 'hippie' type, or positive thinking, or do-gooder,
or even new-agey or loving.....
(and in this world of negativity, I'm actually proud of that. Well, maybe not 'new-agey'- it is a bit too mung-bean for me but 'conscious' I'd try on for size ).....
I do think we do children a service (not a disservice) to help them find their way in the world.
I think there might be other examples that might better illustrate this.
So, if a child's inherent true nature is something to be loved and respected and seen as good,
and not changed, but embraced and valued by the parents,
what happens to those children born with a congenital heart defect, or a lazy eye, or an inability to read, or autism, or a birth mark across their cheek?
Should we leave the child as they are and not try to change them?
Isn't our job as parents to actively try to support and change and alter things to make that child's life easier?
To help them along the way, to smooth the bumps, to soften the falls (not too much, but at least a little).
I think we can see gun play in much the same way.
Gun play can lead to the child being labelled or seen as aggressive, or troublesome, or a bully (especially if their gun play is impacting upon their peers).
It can be intimidating and scary and loud.
So, why wouldn't we help and support the child to make other choices?
(And on another note, who is to know whether the gun-play is innate,
or comes through exposure to guns in the home, on the tv or social environment in which the child lives? Unfortunately, in some cases, the play does comes through direct imitation.
Some would suggest 'playing it out' would be more therapeutic, but what about the other children in the group?)
It really is a difficult one, isn't it! With NO easy answers.
I suppose in essence, the art of 'transformation' is to remedy or bear out external behaviours, which may be causing difficulties to the child or to you as a parent or teacher, rather than innate characteristics. If gun play isn't causing difficulties, then there would be no need for transformation.
But my experience tells me that it often does.
What are your thoughts???